Foster v. Plock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that two parties had substantial identity of interests “because both parties had an interest in a judgment that” reached same conclusion
• recognizing that mutuality is not required for defensive issue preclusion
• noting that privity can arise from “principal-agent . . . relationships”
• finding alignment of interests between different defendants where “both parties had an interest in a judgment that [their conduct] did not injury [plaintiff] or result in damages that would support his claims against [them], respectively”
• “In this case, Foster’s claims against both Wife and Plock turned on the same evidence—the content and disclosure of the same PREs—and involved the same timeline. Therefore, we conclude that there was identity of subject matter between this case and the prior action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Morehead
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2019-06-10· cited 180×
• Foster v. Plock
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2017-05-17· cited 174×
• In re Villas at Highland Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Villas at Highland Park, LLC
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2017-05-22· cited 132×
• Girolametti v. Michael Horton Assocs., Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-06-25· cited 22×
• Pohl v. U.S. Bank
  Tenth Circuit· 2017-06-16· cited 10×
• Gale v. City & County of Denver
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2020-03-02· cited 8×
• Gale v. City and County of Denver
  Tenth Circuit· 2020-06-16· cited 8×
• v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2020-06-08· cited 5×
• Gale v. City and County of Denver
  Tenth Circuit· 2019-05-17· cited 3×

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 2,250×
• Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association
  California Supreme Court· 1942-03-06· cited 895×
• Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway Authority
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2005-03-28· cited 230×
• Bill J. Gambocz v. Anthony M. Yelencsics
  Third Circuit· 1972-10-12· cited 186×
• Lane v. Peterson
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-03-30· cited 140×
• Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 126×
• Daigle v. City of Portsmouth
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-08-06· cited 103×
• Porn v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
  First Circuit· 1996-08-23· cited 92×
• Miller v. Nichols
  First Circuit· 2009-11-04· cited 69×
• City & County of Denver v. Block 173 Associates
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1991-07-09· cited 64×
• Salida School District R-32-J v. Morrison
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-02-17· cited 57×
• Farmers High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of Golden
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1999-03-29· cited 53×
• Cruz v. Benine
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1999-09-13· cited 46×
• Fisher v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-01-19· cited 40×
• Loveland Essential Group, LLC v. Grommon Farms, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-02-02· cited 28×
• Murphy v. Northern Colorado Grain Co.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1971-08-17· cited 27×
• S.O.V. v. People ex rel. M.C.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-08· cited 25×
• Public Service Co. v. Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-01-17· cited 24×
• Salazar v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-08-17· cited 24×
• Wolfe v. Sedalia Water & Sanitation District
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2015-02-09· cited 16×