Eighth Circuit· 3/30/1990

Lane v. Peterson

Citations

899 F.2d 737
1990 WL 34640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding claim preclusion requires the “same cause of action” to be involved in both suits
noting that “[w]e may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record even if not relied upon by the district court”
noting that “[w]e may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record even if not relied upon by the district court”
we may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record even if not relied upon by the district court
a court of appeals may affirm judgment on any ground supported by record even if not relied upon by the district court
claim preclusion precludes relitigation of a claim on grounds that could have been raised in a prior action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Lay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lane v. Peterson

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.