Pohl v. U.S. Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We review de novo a district court’s application of claim preclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Columbian Fin. Corp. v. Bowman
  D. Kansas· 2018-05-17· cited 6×
• Anand v. O'Sullivan
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-30· cited 3×
• Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2019-12-12· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway Authority
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2005-03-28· cited 230×
• Reedy v. Werholtz
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-11-10· cited 217×
• Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2015-01-13· cited 117×
• McKissick v. Yuen
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 109×
• Sanders v. Mountain America Federal Credit Union
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-07-30· cited 109×
• Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. v. Woolsey & Company, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-04-23· cited 46×
• Foster v. Plock
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2017-05-15· cited 28×
• Dirk Beukes v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
  Eighth Circuit· 2015-06-17· cited 4×
• Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2016-07-21· cited 4×
• Campbell v. Redding Medical Center
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-08-22· cited 4×