Salazar v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]lthough the two claims present[] different legal theories, one sounding in contract and the other in tort, they [seek] redress for essentially the same wrong.”
• “Salazar’s bad faith claims would involve much of the same evidence as the UIM benefits claim. Thus, for the jury to hear these claims in the same action would have been convenient and efficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).