Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/9/2019

Fordyce v. Hattan

Citations

2019 Ohio 3199

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by entering summary judgment for appellees on appellants' claims for misrepresentation. There was no justifiable reliance, and the claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Nazareth Deli, L.L.C. v. John W. Dawson Ins., Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-08· cited 15×
Bonner v. Delp
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-22· cited 8×
Brown v. Fukuvi USA Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-13· cited 3×
Kern v. Mishler
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-12· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-04-19· cited 2,982×
Field v. Mans
Supreme Court· 1995-11-28· cited 1,626×
Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-07-25· cited 548×
ABM Farms, Inc. v. Woods
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-04-29· cited 330×
Investors REIT One v. Jacobs
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-11-08· cited 209×
Flowers v. Walker
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-05-06· cited 166×
Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Engineering Group, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-02-07· cited 84×
Cundall v. U.S. Bank
Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-06-04· cited 68×
Flagstar Bank, F.S.B. v. Airline Union's Mortgage Co.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-04-27· cited 58×
Mishler v. Hale
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-31· cited 16×
Ajibola v. Ohio Med. Career College, Ltd.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-02· cited 9×
Kooyman v. Staffco Construction, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-05-21· cited 4×
White v. Smedley's Chevrolet
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-11· cited 2×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.