Brown v. Fukuvi USA Inc.

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 1608

Syllabus

The trial court correctly found that appellee-employer had not agreed to pay appellant sales commissions, and therefore the trial court did not err in granting appellee's motion for summary judgment and in denying appellant's motion for partial summary judgment on his breach of contract claim. The trial court also did not err in entering summary judgment on appellant's claims for promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment, and negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation, because these claims were barred by the applicable statutes of limitation. There were no genuine issues of material fact concerning appellant's claim under Ohio's Prompt Payment Act, because appellant was not entitled to payment of any commissions. Judgment affirmed.