State v. Sercey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate court has jurisdiction to review trial court’s non-final order suppressing evidence of marijuana in defendant’s system because blood specimen upon which expert testimony sought to be excluded was obtained by search and seizure
• reasoning that expert testimony of those with specialized knowledge in a particular field is admissible if applicable to the evidence at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).