Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/14/2016

Florez v. Central Intelligence Agency

Citations

  • 829 F.3d 178
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12925
  • 2016 WL 3769948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “doubts as to the applicability of [an] exemption must be resolved in favor of disclosure”
  • holding waiver was \a privilege reserved to the agency asserting a Glomar response\
  • “[R]emanding the case is in keeping with our general policy that the trial court should consider arguments . . . in the first instance.”
  • remanding to district court to “reconsider its prior conclusion in light of” additional disclosures and submissions it deemed appropriate
  • finding new disclosures “relevant to the issues on appeal” and remanding to “allow the District Court to weigh the significance of the [new] documents in the first instance”
  • giving deference to ALJ’s credibility determination when supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chin, Livingston, Straub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.