Larson v. Department of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that adequacy of agency search “is measured by the reasonableness of the effort in light of the specific request’”
• finding that 18 U.S.C. § 798 is an Exemption 3 withholding statute that mandates withholding of the covered material
• noting that “section 6 of the National Security Act . . . qualifies as an Exemption 3 statute”
• noting that court need only examine whether agency’s classification decision “appears ‘logical’ or ‘plausible’” (citing Wolf v. CIA, 473 F.3d 370, 374-75 (D.C. Cir. 2007))
• finding that 18 U.S.C. § 798 is an Exemption 3 withholding statute that mandates withholding of the covered material
• finding that 18 U.S.C. § 798 is an Exemption 3 withholding statute that mandates withholding of the covered material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).