Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/10/2018

Williams v. Annucci

Citations

  • 895 F.3d 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Triestman in reversing a district court’s grant of summary judgment against a pro se plaintiff
  • remanding because prison did not demonstrate why it could not provide Jewish prisoner “more of the acceptable food it already prepares” or order him prepackaged kosher food
  • “[U]nexplained disparate treatment of ‘analogous nonreligious conduct’ leads us to suspect that a narrower policy that burdens [plaintiffs] to a lesser degree is in fact possible.”
  • \[U]nexplained disparate treatment of 'analogous nonreligious conduct' leads us to suspect that a narrower policy that burdens [the plaintiffs] to a lesser degree is in fact possible.\
  • \[U]nexplained disparate treatment of 'analogous nonreligious conduct' leads us to suspect that a narrower policy that burdens [the plaintiffs] to a lesser degree is in fact possible.\
  • \Such unexplained disparate treatment of 'analogous nonreligious conduct' leads us to question whether the [government's] interest . . . is as compelling as it suggests . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawford, Pooler, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Williams v. Annucci

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.