Skip to main content

Flores v. Aon Corp.

Citations

  • 242 N.E.3d 340
  • 2023 IL App (1st) 230140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • showing that the threshold for sustaining a contract action is higher than that of standing, as an injury may be “sufficient to establish standing” without amounting to “actual monetary damages”
  • finding that all factors relevant to determining whether a common law duty exists “support the conclusion that [the] defendant ha[d] a common law duty to protect the personal information of its clients, in addition to its duty under [PIPA]”
  • “We decline to hold that the alleged diminution in value of plaintiffs’ personal information amounts to actual monetary damages.”
  • “Although the Congregation of the Passion decision concerned a professional malpractice claim against an accounting firm, its reasoning equally applies to data breach cases.”
  • “To successfully make a breach of implied contract claim, a plaintiff must allege actual monetary damages.”
  • “Since plaintiffs’ common law tort claims are based on defendant’s common law duty to safeguard personal information rather than any express contractual duty, the Moorman doctrine does not prohibit plaintiffs from bringing their claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.