Skip to main content
· 10/17/1991

Kalata v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

Citations

  • 581 N.E.2d 656
  • 144 Ill. 2d 425
  • 163 Ill. Dec. 502
  • 1991 Ill. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that city ordinance setting handrail requirements for stairway was a public safety measure
  • specifying the standard of review for findings made by the trier of fact
  • a defendant may prevail despite a violation of statute by showing that he acted reasonably
  • “The [statutory] violation does not constitute negligence per se, however, and therefore the defendant may prevail by showing that he acted reasonably under the circumstances.”
  • a defendant may prevail despite a viola- tion of statute by showing that he acted reasonably
  • “A violation of a statute or ordinance designed to protect human life or property is prima facie evidence of negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.