Voyles v. Sandia Mortgage Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s claim for tortious interference with a prospective business advantage failed because the reports to credit agencies were “accurate and proper”
• recognizing that the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing is generally not “‘an independent source of duties giving rise to a cause of action in tort’”
• holding that tortious interference claim premised on allegedly inaccurate credit reporting cannot succeed when a mortgage servicer truthfully reports a loan as in foreclosure, even when the underlying events leading to the foreclosure are disputed- and the loan is later reinstated
• holding the transmission of “accurate and proper” reports did not amount to intentional interference
• describing the covenant of good faith and fair dealing as a “rule of construction, rather than an independent source of tort liability”
• describing the covenant of good faith and fair dealing as a “rule of construction, rather than an independent source of tort liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).