Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 2/7/2003

Flock v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.

Citations

  • 319 F.3d 231
  • 2003 WL 135648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • asserting that the relevant inquiry in the risk-utility analysis includes “assessing the risk that an adult will allow a child access [to a cigarette lighter] and the gravity of the harm resulting therefrom.”
  • stating that negligence claims require proof of proximate cause
  • subsequent remedial measure was not an issue in this case; case discussing economic feasibility for safer alternative design
  • subsequent remedial measure was not an issue in this case; case discussing economic feasibility for safer alternative design
  • subsequent remedial measure was not an issue in this case; case discussing economic feasibility for safer alternative design
  • “[W]hen circumstances are consistent with either of two factual scenarios and one is no more probable than the other, neither can be inferred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Barksdale, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Flock v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.