Hicks v. Charles Pfizer & Co. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 807(b) is satisfied \where conformity is impossible and the purpose of the rule has been satisfied\ and collecting cases
• “Even if a document qualifies as ancient under Rule 803(16), other hearsay exceptions must be used to render each individual layer of hearsay admissible.”
• “Even if a document qualifies as ancient under Rule 803(16), other hearsay exceptions must be used to render each individual layer of hearsay admissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).