Tompkins v. Cyr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state sanctions rules apply to pleadings filed in state court before removal
• holding that sanctions were properly denied where a Rule 11 motion was filed after the trial's conclusion
• holding that a double recovery challenge was “essentially [an] objection!] to the jury instructions” and that the failure to object to the instructions on that ground “limits the defendants’ ability to appeal on these grounds”
• holding sanctions properly denied where Rule 11 motion filed after trial’s conclusion
• holding sanctions properly denied where Rule 11 motion filed after trial’s conclusion
• agreeing with “other federal courts [which] have applied state sanctions rules to pleadings filed in state court before removal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).