Fifth Circuit· 1/28/2000

Tompkins v. Cyr

Citations

202 F.3d 770
46 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 319
53 Fed. R. Serv. 1424
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1027
2000 WL 96076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that state sanctions rules apply to pleadings filed in state court before removal
holding that sanctions were properly denied where a Rule 11 motion was filed after the trial's conclusion
holding that a double recovery challenge was “essentially [an] objection!] to the jury instructions” and that the failure to object to the instructions on that ground “limits the defendants’ ability to appeal on these grounds”
holding sanctions properly denied where Rule 11 motion filed after trial’s conclusion
holding sanctions properly denied where Rule 11 motion filed after trial’s conclusion
agreeing with “other federal courts [which] have applied state sanctions rules to pleadings filed in state court before removal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Smith, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Tompkins v. Cyr

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.