Flink/Vulcan v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “if the Government otherwise caused the contractor to incur additional work, a constructive change arises for that work performed outside of the scope of the contract”
• no constructive change when contractor could have declined extra work or proceeded under protest, but elected to proceed without reservation, for business reasons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• M.A. DeAtley Construction, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-06-22· cited 7×
• Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-01-12· cited 3×
• Strickland v. United States
  M.D. Florida· 2005-05-19· cited 2×
• Rma Engineering S.A.R.L v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2018-08-29

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
• Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 1,104×
• Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of Wichita
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-09-13· cited 598×
• Daley v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 346×
• McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1996-10-08· cited 328×
• Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1965-01-22· cited 319×
• Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 1994-02-15· cited 319×
• Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1997-03-04· cited 309×
• Mary Ann Jay and Michael H. Jay, as Legal Representatives of Matthew Michael Jay, Deceased v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
  Federal Circuit· 1993-10-14· cited 304×
• Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, and Intergraph Corporation, Intervenor
  Federal Circuit· 1996-06-28· cited 303×
• Prineville Sawmill Company, Inc. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1988-10-14· cited 296×
• Wahba v. New York University
  Supreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 264×
• Pure Gold, Inc. v. Syntex (u.s.a.), Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1984-07-17· cited 230×
• Metric Constructors, Inc. v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  Federal Circuit· 1999-03-03· cited 228×
• Samuel Gart v. Logitech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-06-26· cited 225×
• Coast Federal Bank, Fsb v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2003-03-24· cited 222×
• Kalvar Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1976-10-20· cited 221×

Other cases named Flink/Vulcan v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Flink/Vulcan v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2006-01-12· cited 2×