Tate v. Derifield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “it would be wrong as a matter of public policy to allow recovery on a consortium claim which arose from the lawful incarceration of a spouse”
• “On appeal we may affirm the district court ruling upon any ground raised in district court . . . .”
• “On appeal we may affirm the district court ruling on any ground raised in district court . . . .”
• “We have held that a motion to dismiss can neither rely on facts not alleged in the petition (except those of which judicial notice may be taken) nor be aided by an evidentiary hearing.” (citation omitted)
• “On appeal we may affirm the district court ruling upon any ground raised in district court even if the ground is not one relied upon by the court.”
• “On appeal we may affirm the district court ruling upon any ground raised in district court even if the ground is not one relied upon by the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).