Onofre T. Serrano v. S.W. Francis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was “Serrano’s disability—coupled with administrative segregation in an SHU that was not designed for disabled persons—[that gave] rise to a protected liberty interest.”
• holding that administrative segregation, combined with a wheelchair-bound inmate’s disability, imposed an atypical and significant hardship on that No. 23-1083 Finley v. Huss, et al. Page 26 inmate
• holding that administrative segregation, combined with a wheelchair-bound inmate’s disability, imposed an atypical and significant hardship on that No. 23-1083 Finley v. Huss, et al. Page 26 inmate
• holding that a prisoner pleaded sufficient facts to state an equal protection violation by alleging that a prison official made comments about the prisoner’s race in denying him the opportunity to present witnesses at a hearing
• concluding placement in segregated housing in and 2 of itself does not implicate a protected liberty interest
• explaining that “[t]ypically, administrative segregation in and of itself does not implicate a protected liberty interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).