Hall v. Catoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that an appellate court must affirm the factual findings of the PCR court if there is any probative evidence in the record to support them
• providing that an appellate court must affirm the factual findings of the PCR court if there is any probative evidence in the record to support them
• repeating our previous directive that PCR courts comply with Rule 52(a) (quoting Pruitt v. State , 310 S.C. 254 , 256, 423 S.E.2d 127 , 128 (1992) )
• \[I]t is common practice for judges to ask a party to draft a proposed order for the sake of efficiency.\
• comparison of victim’s life to defendant’s life was impermissibly inflammatory
• repeating our admonition from Pruitt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).