· 8/11/2000
United States v. Ralph Pena-Gutierrez
Citations
- 222 F.3d 1080
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8911
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6719
- 54 Fed. R. Serv. 940
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19147
- 2000 WL 1133550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prosecutor who never tried to contact out-of-country witness despite having his name and address did not make a good-faith effort
- noting that an alien's statement to an immigration officer was hearsay-within-hearsay when the statement was contained in the immigration officer's report
- Explaining that a “district court’s determination that the defendant was not a minor participant in the offense is a factual determination that we review for clear error.”
- Se tenía conocimiento de la dirección del testigo en México y no lo contactaron. El tribunal resolvió que el Estado no demostró tener razón para creer que el testigo no respondería al requerimiento de volver a los Estados Unidos para testificar.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Silverman, Wardlaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.