Skip to main content
· 8/11/2000

United States v. Ralph Pena-Gutierrez

Citations

  • 222 F.3d 1080
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8911
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6719
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 940
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19147
  • 2000 WL 1133550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor who never tried to contact out-of-country witness despite having his name and address did not make a good-faith effort
  • noting that an alien's statement to an immigration officer was hearsay-within-hearsay when the statement was contained in the immigration officer's report
  • Explaining that a “district court’s determination that the defendant was not a minor participant in the offense is a factual determination that we review for clear error.”
  • Se tenía conocimiento de la dirección del testigo en México y no lo contactaron. El tribunal resolvió que el Estado no demostró tener razón para creer que el testigo no respondería al requerimiento de volver a los Estados Unidos para testificar.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Silverman, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.