Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 7/3/1990

Firestone v. Galbreath

Citations

  • 747 F. Supp. 1556
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11192
  • 1990 WL 139936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the RICO statute as applied unconstitutionally vague based upon the \pattern\ requirement
  • holding “pattern” requirement in RICO unconstitutionally vague
  • pattern requirement unconstitutionally vague as to “isolated and sporadic” predicate acts stemming from “a dispute between family members concerning whether certain property should have remained in a relative’s estate”
  • RICO held unconstitutionally vague because the alleged predicate acts were \isolated and sporadic\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.