Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 8/3/2007

Finstuen v. Crutcher

Citations

  • 496 F.3d 1139
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18500
  • 2007 WL 2218887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that full faith and credit requires Oklahoma to recognize an adoption by a same sex couple already formalized in another state even though Oklahoma statute specifically prohibits such adoptions on public policy grounds
  • holding that full faith and credit requires Oklahoma to recognize an adoption by a same sex couple already formalized in another state even though Oklahoma statute specifically prohibits such adoptions on public policy grounds
  • noting that “[u]nsupported conclusory allegations . . . do not create an issue of fact”
  • stating that we could decline to address a newly submitted argument involving prudential standing
  • collecting authorities from Oklahoma, Montana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Mexico, and California that all hold adoption judgments are owed full faith and credit
  • affirming judg- ment that applied full faith and credit clause ‘‘because there is no roving public policy exception’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Ebel, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.