Tenth Circuit· 8/3/2007
Finstuen v. Crutcher
Citations
- 496 F.3d 1139
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18500
- 2007 WL 2218887
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that full faith and credit requires Oklahoma to recognize an adoption by a same sex couple already formalized in another state even though Oklahoma statute specifically prohibits such adoptions on public policy grounds
- holding that full faith and credit requires Oklahoma to recognize an adoption by a same sex couple already formalized in another state even though Oklahoma statute specifically prohibits such adoptions on public policy grounds
- noting that “[u]nsupported conclusory allegations . . . do not create an issue of fact”
- stating that we could decline to address a newly submitted argument involving prudential standing
- collecting authorities from Oklahoma, Montana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Mexico, and California that all hold adoption judgments are owed full faith and credit
- affirming judg- ment that applied full faith and credit clause ‘‘because there is no roving public policy exception’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Ebel, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bronson v. SwensenTenth Circuit· 2007-08-29· cited 757×
- Peterson v. MartinezTenth Circuit· 2013-02-22· cited 260×
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusTenth Circuit· 2013-06-27· cited 211×
- Devon Energy Production Co. v. Mosiac Potash Carlsbad, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2012-08-22· cited 189×
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. EdmondsonTenth Circuit· 2010-02-02· cited 160×
- The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, UtahTenth Circuit· 2011-01-11· cited 146×
- Kitchen v. HerbertTenth Circuit· 2014-06-25· cited 137×
- Grocery Manufacturers Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2012-08-17· cited 112×
- J.M.W. v. T.I.Z.Utah Supreme Court· 2011-07-19· cited 105×
- United States v. Roger Day, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2012-11-29· cited 101×
- Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.Tenth Circuit· 2017-06-05· cited 66×
- Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2013-05-28· cited 64×
- Knight First Amendment Inst. At Columbia Univ. v. TrumpS.D. Illinois· 2018-05-23· cited 40×
- Copar Pumice Co., Inc. v. TidwellTenth Circuit· 2010-04-19· cited 31×
- In re the Guardianship of SmithSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2010-11-15· cited 30×
- Adar v. SmithFifth Circuit· 2011-04-12· cited 27×
- Elmer Lucas v. Jerusalem Cafe, LLCEighth Circuit· 2013-07-29· cited 25×
- Henry v. HimesS.D. Ohio· 2014-04-14· cited 21×
- Wamsley v. NODAK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court· 2008-02-19· cited 20×
- Begay v. Public Service Co. of NMD. New Mexico· 2010-04-15· cited 19×
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 1,768×
- United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) PhotographsSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 690×
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 608×
- Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 589×
- Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 527×
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court· 1998-01-13· cited 516×
- Nevada v. HallSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 510×
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 488×
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court· 1935-12-09· cited 351×
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court· 1968-03-06· cited 346×
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court· 1939-03-27· cited 304×
- Franks v. NimmoTenth Circuit· 1986-07-07· cited 303×
- MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverTenth Circuit· 2005-07-14· cited 297×
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. WalkerTenth Circuit· 2006-05-17· cited 289×
- Nova Health Systems v. FogartyTenth Circuit· 2005-07-20· cited 250×
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. SlaterSupreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 243×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.