Skip to main content
· 1/12/2000

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater

Citations

  • 528 U.S. 216
  • 120 S. Ct. 722
  • 145 L. Ed. 2d 650
  • 2000 U.S. LEXIS 505
  • 68 U.S.L.W. 3456
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 308
  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 48
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 373
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 135
  • 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,195
  • 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim is mooted on appeal where it is absolutely clear that litigant no longer needs judicial protection
  • ruling recidivism was not an element of a particular offense and, therefore, need not be charged in an indictment or determined by a jury
  • ruling prior convie-tions need not be submitted to jury when used as sentence enhancements
  • describing how the Federal Government voluntarily ceased its offending conduct and holding that the case was not moot
  • describing how the Federal Government voluntarily ceased its offending conduct and holding that the case was not moot
  • noting that this “heavy burden” lies with the party asserting mootness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.