Supreme Court· 1/12/2000
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater
Citations
- 528 U.S. 216
- 120 S. Ct. 722
- 145 L. Ed. 2d 650
- 2000 U.S. LEXIS 505
- 68 U.S.L.W. 3456
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 308
- 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 48
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 373
- 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 135
- 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,195
- 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1016
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that claim is mooted on appeal where it is absolutely clear that litigant no longer needs judicial protection
- ruling recidivism was not an element of a particular offense and, therefore, need not be charged in an indictment or determined by a jury
- ruling prior convie-tions need not be submitted to jury when used as sentence enhancements
- describing how the Federal Government voluntarily ceased its offending conduct and holding that the case was not moot
- describing how the Federal Government voluntarily ceased its offending conduct and holding that the case was not moot
- noting that this “heavy burden” lies with the party asserting mootness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
148 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- People v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-05-23· cited 654×
- Hazel Golden v. City of Columbus Cheryl Roberto, Director of Public Utilities for the City of ColumbusSixth Circuit· 2005-04-18· cited 356×
- Brown v. BuhmanTenth Circuit· 2016-05-13· cited 320×
- Demery v. ArpaioNinth Circuit· 2004-08-06· cited 247×
- United States v. MaxwellEleventh Circuit· 2009-08-19· cited 244×
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceNinth Circuit· 2012-06-01· cited 152×
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court· 2009-12-16· cited 142×
- League of Women Voters of Ohio v. BrunnerSixth Circuit· 2008-11-26· cited 130×
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 2020-04-27· cited 128×
- West Virginia v. EPASupreme Court· 2022-06-30· cited 117×
- Finstuen v. CrutcherTenth Circuit· 2007-08-03· cited 113×
- Speech First, Incorporated v. Gregory FenvesFifth Circuit· 2020-10-28· cited 92×
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. MinetaSupreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 85×
- United States v. Danny BurginSixth Circuit· 2004-11-03· cited 84×
- Bruce Rich v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2013-05-14· cited 83×
- Ouachita Watch League v. JacobsEleventh Circuit· 2006-09-05· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. BavusaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-29· cited 80×
- WildEarth Guardians v. Public Service CompanyTenth Circuit· 2012-08-10· cited 79×
- Town of Barnstable v. O'ConnorFirst Circuit· 2015-05-18· cited 78×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 2,323×
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 2,156×
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 1,322×
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 1968-11-25· cited 896×
- Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSupreme Court· 1982-07-01· cited 804×
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaD. Colorado· 1997-06-04· cited 18×
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. SlaterTenth Circuit· 1999-03-04· cited 11×
Other cases named Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.