· 1/12/2000
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater
Citations
- 528 U.S. 216
- 120 S. Ct. 722
- 145 L. Ed. 2d 650
- 2000 U.S. LEXIS 505
- 68 U.S.L.W. 3456
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 308
- 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 48
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 373
- 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 135
- 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,195
- 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1016
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that claim is mooted on appeal where it is absolutely clear that litigant no longer needs judicial protection
- ruling recidivism was not an element of a particular offense and, therefore, need not be charged in an indictment or determined by a jury
- ruling prior convie-tions need not be submitted to jury when used as sentence enhancements
- describing how the Federal Government voluntarily ceased its offending conduct and holding that the case was not moot
- describing how the Federal Government voluntarily ceased its offending conduct and holding that the case was not moot
- noting that this “heavy burden” lies with the party asserting mootness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.