Copar Pumice Co., Inc. v. Tidwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the two tests used to determine whether a mineral qualifies as a valuable mineral deposit: (1
• determining whether \an alternative reading [other than that of the Secretary] is compelled ... by other indications of the Secretary's intent at the time of the regulation's promulgation\ by referencing the regulatory history including responses to public comments
• “Copar acknowledged in the [2002] settlement agreement that it could not dispose of any common variety pumice produced from [the El Cajete Mine].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).