Fields v. J. Haynes Waters Builders, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in order to warrant reversal, the appealing party must show both the error of the ruling and resulting prejudice
• holding that in order to warrant reversal, the appealing party must show both the error of the ruling and resulting prejudice
• holding that in order to warrant reversal, the appealing party must show both the error of the ruling and resulting prejudice
• finding that the trial court's error in failing to qualify an expert was harmless error since the testimony would have been cumulative
• finding that the trial court’s error in failing to qualify an expert was harmless error since the testimony would have been cumulative
• holding that the appellate court reviews questions of law de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).