Skip to main content
· 10/28/1980

Terlinde v. Neely

Citations

  • 271 S.E.2d 768
  • 275 S.C. 395
  • 10 A.L.R. 4th 379
  • 1980 S.C. LEXIS 480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “length of time for latent defects to surface ... should be controlled by the standard of reasonableness”
  • holding that a subsequent purchaser of a home may pursue a cause of action in contract or tort against a developer
  • holding that a subsequent purchaser of a home may pursue a cause of action in contract or tort against a developer
  • holding that “[t]he only logical application” of the principles underlying the implied warranty of workmanship requires a holding that it “extends to subsequent home purchasers for a reasonable amount of time”
  • holding that “[t]he only logical application” of the principles underlying the implied warranty of workmanship requires a holding that it “extends to subsequent home purchasers for a reasonable amount of time”
  • holding that a contract between a homebuilder and homeowner extended, to future home purchasers because, by placing his product into the stream of commerce, the builder owed a duty of care to the product’s users

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory, Harwfll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.