· 10/28/1980
Terlinde v. Neely
Citations
- 271 S.E.2d 768
- 275 S.C. 395
- 10 A.L.R. 4th 379
- 1980 S.C. LEXIS 480
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the “length of time for latent defects to surface ... should be controlled by the standard of reasonableness”
- holding that a subsequent purchaser of a home may pursue a cause of action in contract or tort against a developer
- holding that a subsequent purchaser of a home may pursue a cause of action in contract or tort against a developer
- holding that “[t]he only logical application” of the principles underlying the implied warranty of workmanship requires a holding that it “extends to subsequent home purchasers for a reasonable amount of time”
- holding that “[t]he only logical application” of the principles underlying the implied warranty of workmanship requires a holding that it “extends to subsequent home purchasers for a reasonable amount of time”
- holding that a contract between a homebuilder and homeowner extended, to future home purchasers because, by placing his product into the stream of commerce, the builder owed a duty of care to the product’s users
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory, Harwfll
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.