Fifth Circuit· 12/11/1981
Fernandes v. Limmer
Citations
- 663 F.2d 619
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting \interim setbacks on interlocutory motions\ as immaterial to the determination of which party is the \prevailing\ party
- rejecting “interim setbacks on interlocutory motions” as immaterial to the determination of which party is the “prevailing” party
- applying Schaumburg to invalidate a statute imposing an expense limitation on charitable solicitations, and distinguishing National Foundation because of the exemptions in the ordinance involved in that case
- \Courts confronted with motions to dismiss a suit for failure to join purportedly 'indispensable parties' properly approach the problem pragmatically.\
- \standard of `good reason' is indefinite and does not comport with the constitutional requirement that discretion in public officials be specifically and narrowly circumscribed\
- Dallas-Fort Worth airport's blanket prohibition of solicitation and distribution inside its terminals held overbroad because it unduly restricted First Amendment activity within a public forum
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ingraham, Politz, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 951×
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court· 1992-06-26· cited 787×
- George Basiardanes v. City of GalvestonFifth Circuit· 1982-08-19· cited 143×
- Shirley Kramer v. Tom Price, Judge, County Criminal Court No. 5, and Carl Thomas, Sheriff, Dallas County, TexasFifth Circuit· 1983-08-15· cited 98×
- The Miami Herald Publishing Co., Cross v. City of Hallandale, Cross-AppelleesEleventh Circuit· 1984-06-18· cited 98×
- Sullivan v. City of AugustaFirst Circuit· 2007-12-14· cited 75×
- Sentinel Communications Co. v. WattsEleventh Circuit· 1991-07-26· cited 71×
- Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group v. Arthur B. PowersSecond Circuit· 1983-12-07· cited 66×
- At&T Communications v. BellSouth Telecommunications Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2001-01-16· cited 65×
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 11, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,084 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Brown & Root, Inc., Cross-AppellantFifth Circuit· 1982-10-04· cited 60×
- Joseph H. Munson Co. v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-06-26· cited 55×
- Jack McGregor v. Board of Commissioners of Palm Beach CountyEleventh Circuit· 1992-02-19· cited 54×
- The International Society for Krishna Consciousness of New Orleans, Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton RougeFifth Circuit· 1989-07-05· cited 50×
- Dr. Bhartur N. Premachandra v. Dr. Murray G. Mitts, Etc.Eighth Circuit· 1984-04-18· cited 46×
- U.S. Southwest Africa/namibia Trade & Cultural Council v. United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1983-05-27· cited 45×
- Central Florida Nuclear Freeze Campaign and Bruce Gagnon v. Frederick J. Walsh, Chief of Police of Orlando, FloridaEleventh Circuit· 1985-11-04· cited 45×
- Plain Dealer Publishing Co., Cross-Appellee v. City of Lakewood, Cross-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1986-07-10· cited 43×
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasFifth Circuit· 1988-02-12· cited 43×
- Citizens to End Animal Suffering & Exploitation, Inc. v. Faneuil Hall Marketplace, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1990-08-27· cited 41×
- N.W. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of HoustonS.D. Texas· 1998-08-07· cited 39×
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 3,484×
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court· 1971-10-12· cited 3,142×
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 2,261×
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court· 1939-06-05· cited 2,178×
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 1,835×
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court· 1939-11-22· cited 1,688×
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court· 1931-06-01· cited 1,633×
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,485×
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 1,402×
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 1,301×
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court· 1969-03-10· cited 1,269×
- Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 1,260×
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court· 1975-03-18· cited 1,256×
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 1,248×
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court· 1964-06-01· cited 1,188×
Other cases named Fernandes v. Limmer
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.