Fifth Circuit· 12/11/1981
Fernandes v. Limmer
Citations
- 663 F.2d 619
- 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1623
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that legislative immunity from damage awards is \irrelevant\ to determining an award of counsel fees
- stating that legislative immunity from damage awards is “irrelevant” to determining an award of counsel fees
- noting “lack of restrictions on entry by the general public, and the commercial, street-like character of the terminal concourses”
- “direct and immediate danger or hazard to the public security, health, safety or welfare” standard is overly vague
- traffic concerns do not “justify the total exclusion of those wishing to exercise free speech”
- that the passageways of the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport are crowded and narrow does not justify prohibiting Krishna followers from distributing literature and soliciting funds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 951×
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court· 1992-06-26· cited 787×
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasFifth Circuit· 1988-02-12· cited 43×
- Jane Doe I v. Juana Marine-LombardFifth Circuit· 2018-11-16· cited 40×
- Visser v. MagnarelliN.D. New York· 1982-07-09· cited 26×
- International Women's Day March Planning Committee v. City of San AntonioFifth Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 25×
- United States v. Rainbow FamilyE.D. Texas· 1988-06-01· cited 22×
- Penthouse International, Ltd. v. KochS.D. New York· 1984-12-19· cited 12×
- Brownell v. City of RochesterW.D. New York· 2001-05-14· cited 11×
- Jenevein v. WillingFifth Circuit· 2010-04-30· cited 10×
- Young v. New York City Transit AuthorityS.D. New York· 1990-01-29· cited 8×
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeS.D. New York· 1989-09-15· cited 6×
- Bizien v. PORT AUTHORITY OF STATES OF NY & NJE.D. New York· 1983-07-08· cited 5×
- Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of Roy, UtahD. Utah· 2004-09-07· cited 4×
- Klein v. San Diego CountyNinth Circuit· 2006-09-18· cited 4×
- Jane Doe I v. Juana Marine-LombardFifth Circuit· 2018-09-20· cited 2×
- Fernandes v. LimmerFifth Circuit· 1982-01-27
- Boardley v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-17
- Pérez De Otero v. Estado Libre Asociado De Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2015-02-13
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 3,484×
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court· 1971-10-12· cited 3,142×
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 2,261×
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court· 1939-06-05· cited 2,178×
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 1,835×
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court· 1939-11-22· cited 1,688×
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court· 1931-06-01· cited 1,633×
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,485×
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 1,402×
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 1,301×
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court· 1969-03-10· cited 1,269×
- Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 1,260×
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court· 1975-03-18· cited 1,256×
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 1,248×
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court· 1964-06-01· cited 1,188×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.