The Miami Herald Publishing Co., Cross v. City of Hallandale, Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “to the extent the statute challenged is regulatory rather than revenue raising in purpose, the measure does not constitute a tax, and the district court retains jurisdiction”
• “In a facial challenge such as this, the facts of the challenging party’s case are irrelevant.”
• “In a facial challenge such as this, the facts of the challenging party’s case are irrelevant.”
• reasonable “time, place, and manner” regulations may be necessary to further significant government interests, and are permitted
• “[I]n the unique context of first amendment challenges upon the facial validity of licensing statutes, it is the very existence of official discretion that gives rise to a threat of injury sufficient to warrant an injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).