Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no trespass where the prior owner contaminated the land now owned by a subsequent owner because there was no intrusion on the land of another
• discharge by plaintiffs predecessor in title of pollutants onto ground while owned by predecessor not placed tortiously under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 161
• \Courts which have considered such claims have rejected them on the basis that a cause of action for private nuisance requires an interference with a neighbor's use and enjoyment of the land.\
• trespass involves tortiously placing something on the land of another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).