Tenth Circuit· 5/3/2002

Farmer v. Perrill

Citations

288 F.3d 1254
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 8591
2002 WL 845048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that prisoner strip searches must be “reasonably related to a legitimate penological interest” (emphasis omitted)
recognizing that prisoner strip searches must be “reasonably related to a legitimate penological interest” (emphasis omitted)
recognizing that prisoner strip searches must be “reasonably related to a legitimate penological interest” (emphasis omitted)
opining that “the right not to be subjected to a humiliating strip search in full view of several (or perhaps many) others” is “well established”
recognizing a strip search may be unreasonable if conducted in the open, “visible to a number of other inmates and staff,” and without regard for the inmate’s privacy interests
recognizing a strip search may be unreasonable if conducted in the open, “visible to a number of other inmates and staff,” and without regard for the inmate’s privacy interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Holloway, Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.