Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 8/18/2017

Amanda Sumpter v. Wayne Cty.

Citations

  • 868 F.3d 473
  • 2017 FED App. 0187P
  • 2017 WL 3568607
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the plaintiff lacked standing because her \claims for injunctive and declaratory relief did not present an actual case or controversy at the time she filed her complaint\
  • finding that cases decided after the events at issue “could not have put the defendant on notice that her conduct was unconstitutional”
  • discussing that a plaintiff must satisfy both prongs of the qualified immunity analysis to defeat an assertion of qualified immunity
  • finding that cases decided after the events at issue “could not have put the defendant on notice that her conduct was unconstitutional”
  • explaining that “the clearly established right recognized in Stoudemire” was the right to be free of “a public strip search ‘devoid’ of justification”
  • stating that the “intrusion [was] only magnified by the fact that plaintiff was exposed to several other inmates during each search.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Circuit-Judge, Clay, Sutton, Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.