Skip to main content
· 3/1/2005

Copelin-Brown v. New Mexico State Personnel Office

Citations

  • 399 F.3d 1248
  • 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 769
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3445
  • 2005 WL 469601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff had a protected property interest and stating that “New Mexico law clearly states that employees that have completed a probationary period of one year may only be terminated for just cause”
  • finding that the plaintiff had a protected property interest and stating that \New Mexico law clearly states that employees that have completed a probationary period of one year may only be terminated for just cause\
  • “Summary 23 Appellate Case: 19-1454 Document: 010110675766 Date Filed: 04/26/2022 Page: 24 judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Anderson, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.