· 3/1/2005
Copelin-Brown v. New Mexico State Personnel Office
Citations
- 399 F.3d 1248
- 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 769
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3445
- 2005 WL 469601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the plaintiff had a protected property interest and stating that “New Mexico law clearly states that employees that have completed a probationary period of one year may only be terminated for just cause”
- finding that the plaintiff had a protected property interest and stating that \New Mexico law clearly states that employees that have completed a probationary period of one year may only be terminated for just cause\
- “Summary 23 Appellate Case: 19-1454 Document: 010110675766 Date Filed: 04/26/2022 Page: 24 judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Anderson, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.