Tenth Circuit· 7/2/2019

Colbruno v. Kessler

Citations

928 F.3d 1155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment “applies to those who have been convicted of crime”
holding pretrial detainee stated a viable due process claim when he alleged that prison officials walked naked detainee through public areas of hospital
finding that the plaintiff’s allegations describing events over several hours gave rise to the reasonable infer- ence that the correctional official defendants had time to find clothing for the defendant
“We have held that psychological harm, as well as physical injury, can implicate the Eighth Amendment.” (citations omitted)
“We have held that psychological harm, as well as physical injury, can implicate the Eighth Amendment.” (citations omitted)
“For those in pretrial confinement, such as Plaintiff, claims regarding mistreatment while in custody generally do not come within the protection of the Fourth Amendment or the Eighth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tymkovich, Murphy, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.