Lopez v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, when declining supplemental jurisdiction would necessitate duplicative litigation which would be wasteful of judicial and litigant resources, federal courts have declined to dismiss TGTLA claims
• finding that the defendant’s placement of the special-needs victim on the same school bus as a student with a history of inappropriate sexual behavior, where the victim had “free reign” and no monitor, could be found to be a state-created danger
• denying summary judgment on Title IX sex abuse claim because a reasonable jury could find that school district had knowledge of abuser’s proclivities
• “The Motions to Strike additional statements of undisputed facts will be denied. Those statements amplify the issues and, for the most part, were filed in an effort to contradict statements made in the opponents’ statements of undisputed facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).