New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 10/12/1973
Fablok Mills v. Cocker MacH. Co.
Citations
- 310 A.2d 491
- 125 N.J. Super. 251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- question of fact whether buyer’s continued use waived right to revocation where alternative was going out of business because seller was only supplier of machine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Fritz, Lynch and Trautwein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pomerantz Paper Corp. v. New Community Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-07-25· cited 369×
- L.S. Heath & Son, Inc. v. At & T Information Systems, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1993-12-08· cited 267×
- Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-07-24· cited 137×
- Perth Amboy Iron Works v. Am. HomeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-06-30· cited 75×
- Toshiba MacHine Co. v. SPM Flow Control, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-10· cited 72×
- Fargo MacHine & Tool Co. v. Kearney & Trecker Corp.E.D. Michigan· 1977-02-07· cited 71×
- Computerized Radiological Services, Cross-Appellant v. Syntex Corporation and Syntex Analytical Instruments, Inc., Cross-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1986-03-13· cited 70×
- Chatlos Systems, Inc. v. National Cash Register Corp.D. New Jersey· 1979-11-14· cited 54×
- Johannsen v. Minnesota Valley Ford Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-04-10· cited 35×
- GMAC v. JankowitzNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-04-01· cited 34×
- Ludwig v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-07-09· cited 34×
- Pavesi v. Ford Motor CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-01-10· cited 30×
- City Nat. Bank of Charleston v. WellsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-08-02· cited 28×
- Basselen v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-07-01· cited 28×
- FIRE DIST. NO. 9, ETC. v. American La FranceNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-12-24· cited 25×
- O'Shea v. HatchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-01-19· cited 18×
- Alden Press, Inc. v. Block & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-07-20· cited 16×
- Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. v. Nuclear Cardiology Systems, Inc.D. Colorado· 1996-10-03· cited 14×
- Cardwell v. International Housing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-12-01· cited 14×
- Cuesta v. Classic Wheels, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-03-21· cited 12×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America CorporationE.D. Missouri· 1971-10-18· cited 77×
- The Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America CorporationEighth Circuit· 1972-06-01· cited 71×
- Rankin v. SowinskiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1972-06-03· cited 24×
- Minsel v. El Rancho Mobile Home Center, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1971-03-26· cited 23×
- Savoia v. FW Woolworth Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1965-06-10· cited 22×
- Ray v. Beneficial Fin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1966-10-27· cited 21×
- Trailmobile Division of Pullman, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1968-10-08· cited 15×
- Ingle v. Marked Tree Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1968-06-03· cited 15×
- Walter E. Heller & Co. v. Hammond Appliance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1959-06-01· cited 9×
- Kelleher v. Detroit MotorsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-10-20· cited 6×
- Walter E. Heller & Co., Inc. v. HammondNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-11-03· cited 5×
- Fablok Mills, Inc. v. COCKER MACHINE & FOUNDRYNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1972-07-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.