Skip to main content
· 1/19/1982

O'Shea v. Hatch

Citations

  • 640 P.2d 515
  • 97 N.M. 409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that buyer’s act of having surgery performed on horse did not constitute acceptance of the horse where it was seller who suggested and consented to the operation on the horse
  • purpose of statutory requirement of notice is to enable seller to minimize damages by curing defect and giving seller immunity against stale claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donnelly, Walters, Sutin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.