Skip to main content
· 10/3/1996

Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. v. Nuclear Cardiology Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 945 F. Supp. 1421
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14959
  • 1996 WL 580409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that parties who will be most discouraged from settling “will be those who fear future, related liability based on negative partial summary judgment orders”
  • rejecting Golman’s holding, though not in the context of comparative fault, that partial summary judgments are not sufficiently “final” to give them preclusive effect
  • rejecting Golman’s holding, though not in the context of comparative fault, that partial summary judgments are not sufficiently “final” to give them preclusive effect
  • applying issue preclusion to partial summary judgment where issue was fully litigated but defendant chose to forego appeal by settling before final judgment was entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Babcock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.