Skip to main content
· 10/18/1971

Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America Corporation

Citations

  • 333 F. Supp. 1183
  • 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 111
  • 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • provision that machine must “be capable of welding at 1000' per fifty minute hour, or a gross rate of 1200' per hour” held not to constitute an explicit warranty of future performance
  • welder performance warranty did not make reference to future time
  • welder performance warranty did not make reference to future time
  • welding equipment failed to perform as specified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.