Exxon Mobil v. Healey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court “cannot enjoin what no longer exists”
• explaining that “a request for a declaratory judgment as to a past [constitutional] violation cannot itself establish a case or controversy to avoid mootness” (citing Green v. Mansour, 474 U.S. 64, 73–74 (1985))
• analogizing Massachusetts law to New York law and rejecting plaintiff’s argument that res judicata did not apply because the prior state proceeding to set aside a civil investigative demand “was limited in nature”
• “[T]he Eleventh Amendment bars the award of money damages against state officials in their official capacities.”’
• “[T]he Eleventh Amendment bars the award of money damages against state officials in their official capacities.”
• “[T]he Eleventh Amendment bars the award of money damages against state officials in their official capacities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tripathy v. McKoy
  Second Circuit· 2024-05-29· cited 44×
• Lowe v. Gagne-Holmes
  First Circuit· 2025-01-17· cited 3×
• Antonyuk Hardaway Christian Spencer v. Chiumento
  Second Circuit· 2023-12-08
• Antonyuk v. James
  Second Circuit· 2024-10-24
• Town of Newburgh v. Newburgh EOM LLC
  Second Circuit· 2025-09-11
• VDARE Foundation, Inc. v. James
  Second Circuit· 2025-12-17

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
• Allen v. McCurry
  Supreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
• United States v. W. T. Grant Co.
  Supreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 2,512×
• Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-30· cited 2,306×
• United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1950-11-13· cited 2,057×
• Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland
  Supreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 1,977×
• County of Los Angeles v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 1,768×
• Church of Scientology of California v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 1,710×
• Green v. Mansour
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 1,617×
• U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership
  Supreme Court· 1994-11-08· cited 1,229×
• Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-14· cited 1,126×
• Hewitt v. Helms
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 973×
• United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash Babcock
  Second Circuit· 1996-01-02· cited 255×
• Heacock v. Heacock
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-03-22· cited 219×
• Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Medicine
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-08-11· cited 191×
• Richard and Anita Poliquin v. Garden Way, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1993-04-20· cited 143×
• McGinty v. New York
  Second Circuit· 2001-05-22· cited 115×
• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 2000-03-24· cited 100×
• Mackintosh v. Chambers
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1934-03-27· cited 82×
• NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1992-07-22· cited 80×