Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 5/29/2024

Tripathy v. McKoy

Citations

  • 103 F.4th 106

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prisoner’s request for injunctive relief became moot when he was released from prison
  • noting that arguments raised “obliquely and in passing” or “adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed forfeited” (alteration accepted and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “...we remain bound by Gonyea's holding that RLUIPA does not permit individual-capacity damages against state officers.”
  • Supreme Court decision abrogates circuit precedent if there is “a conflict, incompatibility, or inconsistency” between the decision and precedent (internal citation omitted)
  • “A person’s transfer from a prison facility generally moots claims for declaratory and injunctive relief against officials of that facility.”
  • defendants entitled to qualified immunity where no binding precedent found that challenged conduct violated Free Exercise Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.