Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/28/2005
Ex Parte Wilson
Citations
- 625 S.E.2d 205
- 367 S.C. 7
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Absent some specialized statute, the immediate appealability of an interlocutory or intermediate order depends on whether the order falls within [section] 14-3-330.”
- “Absent some specialized statute, the immediate appealability of an interlocutory or intermediate order depends on whether the order falls within § 14-3-330.” (emphasis added)
- “If a rule’s language is plain, unambiguous, and conveys a clear meaning, ... the stated meaning should be enforced.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tillman v. TillmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-06-14· cited 9×
- State v. LooperSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-11-08· cited 4×
- Dorn v. CohenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-12-20· cited 3×
- Norwest Props., LLC v. StreblerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-01· cited 3×
- Kriti Ripley, LLC v. Emerald Investments, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-06-26· cited 3×
- Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. LongCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-01-19· cited 2×
- State v. SamuelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-02-25· cited 2×
- Wieters v. Bon-Secours-St. Francis Xavier Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-23· cited 2×
- Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-10-27· cited 2×
- Wieters v. BON-SECOURS-ST. FRANCIS XAVIER HOSP.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-23· cited 1×
- Pee Dee Health Care, P.A. v. Estate of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-11-02· cited 1×
- Smith v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-12-21· cited 1×
- Kosciusko v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-11-06
- Garrison v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-01-08
- Jolly v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-09-01
- Gleaton v. Orangeburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-07-05
- State v. Richard Alexander MurdaughSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2026-05-13
- State v. Ryan L. Manigo (2)Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2026-06-24
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 66×
- Ferguson v. Charleston Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 40×
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Express Freight Lines, Incorporated, Appeal of Christopher A. JansenSeventh Circuit· 1992-07-23· cited 29×
- Knotts v. S.C. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-01-07· cited 29×
- Municipal Ass'n v. AT & T Communications of the Southern States, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-22· cited 28×
- Culbertson v. ClemensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-20· cited 25×
- Ex Parte WhetstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-05-22· cited 23×
- Baldwin Const. Co., Inc. v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-02-02· cited 21×
- Green Ex Rel. Green v. Lewis Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-04· cited 20×
- Maxwell v. GenezSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-12-22· cited 20×
- Johnson v. Service Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-07-03· cited 15×
- Lowndes Products, Inc. v. BrowerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-05-08· cited 14×
- Lynn v. International Brotherhood of Firemen & OilersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-11-17· cited 9×
- Johnson v. Service Management, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 8×
- Patterson v. Specter Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-14· cited 7×
- Anchor Gas, Inc. v. Border Black Top, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-11· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.