Baldwin Const. Co., Inc. v. Graham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order denying a motion to file an amended answer was not immediately appealable because the trial court did not rule on the substantive content of the answer and the parties \ha[d] not 'arrived at the end of the road'\
• holding an order denying a motion to file an amended answer was not immediately appealable because the court did not strike a pleading on its merits but refused to allow its filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).