Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/25/2015
State v. Samuel
Citations
- 411 S.C. 602
- 769 S.E.2d 662
- 2015 S.C. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Absent some specialized statute, the immediate appealability of an interlocutory or intermediate order depends on whether the order falls within [section] 14-3-330 [of the South Carolina Code].” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-12-28· cited 40×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-22· cited 30×
- Baldwin Const. Co., Inc. v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-02-02· cited 21×
- State v. SamuelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-11-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.