Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/29/2004

Ex Parte White

Citations

160 S.W.3d 46
2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1612
2004 WL 2179272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that counsel was not ineffective for adopting an all-or-nothing approach and for refusing to request a lesser-included offense
holding that appellant must establish both deficient performance and prejudice to succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
holding that “[j]ust because . . . another attorney would have pursued another strategy does not make this [all-or-nothing] strategy unreasonable”
holding that to establish ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to object during trial, appellant must show trial court would have committed error in overruling objection
holding that appellant must show that trial court would have committed error by overruling objection to show ineffective assistance of counsel based on failure to object
concluding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a lesser-included offense instruction on manslaughter when the defendant preferred to adopt an all-or-nothing trial strategy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Keller, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Meyers, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

449 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ex Parte White

60 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.