Skip to main content

Ex Parte White

Citations

  • 211 S.W.3d 316
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12
  • 2007 WL 57785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, for enhancement purposes, prior conviction must be final conviction and generally probated sentence is not final conviction unless probation is revoked
  • concluding that the Delaware offense of unlawful sexual contact was substantially similar to the Texas offense of indecency with a child even though the Delaware offense prohibited sexual contact with a minor under the age of sixteen, as opposed to seventeen
  • holding Delaware offense of unlawful sexual contact is substantially similar to Texas offense of indecency with a child
  • upholding use of Delaware conviction for enhancement purposes even though deferred-adjudication probation had not been revoked because Texas Penal Code section 12.42(g)(1
  • upholding use of Delaware conviction for enhancement purposes even though deferred-adjudication probation had not been revoked because Texas Penal Code section 12.42(g)(1
  • concluding elements are substantially similar notwithstanding one year age difference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.