Ex Parte White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the indictment used in the enhancement conviction was void, the trial court never acquired jurisdiction and therefore the defendant could attack the prior conviction for the first time on appeal
• holding that where the indictment used in the enhancement conviction was void, the trial court never acquired jurisdiction and therefore the defendant could attack the prior conviction for the first time on appeal
• continuing to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief for a claim that an enhancement had been improper, notwithstanding Hill , because the prior conviction had been predicated on a fundamentally defective charging instrument
• continuing to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief for a claim that an enhancement had been improper, notwithstanding Hill, because the prior conviction had been predicated on a fundamentally defective charging instrument
• continuing to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief for a claim that an enhancement had been improper, notwithstanding Hill , because the prior conviction had been predicated on a fundamentally defective charging instrument
• continuing to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief for a claim that an enhancement had been improper, notwithstanding Hill , because the prior conviction had been predicated on a fundamentally defective charging instrument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ex Parte Rich
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-07· cited 316×
• Heath v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-23· cited 189×
• Hogue v. Johnson
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-12-12· cited 115×
• Ex Parte Patterson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-06-10· cited 91×
• Ex parte Pue
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-02-28· cited 57×
• Ex Parte Russell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 50×
• Ray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-02· cited 30×
• Ex Parte Miller
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-05-08· cited 19×
• Whitehead v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-05-29· cited 19×
• Ex Parte Gonzales
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-02-12· cited 18×
• Smola v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-09· cited 17×
• Ex Parte Adams
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-12-18· cited 10×
• Ex parte Todd
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-05-23· cited 10×
• Ex Parte Cashman
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-05-23· cited 9×
• Frederick Douglas Weaver v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections
  Fifth Circuit· 1984-05-21· cited 8×
• Hogue v. Scott
  N.D. Texas· 1995-01-18· cited 5×
• Ex parte Clay
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-01-31· cited 5×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-06-05· cited 3×
• Morin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-05-24· cited 1×
• Melvin Max Ray, Sr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-10-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Cannon
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-11-10· cited 161×
• Hill v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-24· cited 102×
• Davila v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-03-09· cited 85×
• Ex Parte Nivens
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-07-22· cited 31×
• Ex Parte Howeth
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-12-10· cited 28×
• Ex Parte Garcia
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-03-14· cited 9×