Skip to main content

Ex Parte Webb

Citations

  • 270 S.W.3d 108
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1442
  • 2008 WL 5047668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that court of appeals was not required to recall its mandate and considering merits of application for habeas relief
  • recognizing that issuance of a mandate in Texas is “an appellate court’s official notice, directed to the court below, advising it of the appellate court’s decision and directing it to have the appellate court’s judgment duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.”
  • holding court of appeals not required to recall its mandate for defendant to seek out-of-time petition for discretionary review
  • granting PDR and reinstating appeal process does not render court of appeal’s mandate ineffective
  • court of appeals not required to recall its mandate or have its clerk issue a new mandate once Court of Criminal Appeals refused inmate’s untimely PDR
  • “It has long been the rule that a conviction from which an appeal has been taken is final . . . when the clerk of the court of appeals issues that court’s mandate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.