Skip to main content

E.W. Ex Rel. J.R.W. v. Hall

Citations

  • 917 P.2d 854
  • 260 Kan. 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing whether social security benefits placed in a certificate of deposit retained their status as exempt from attachment/garnishment under Porter
  • rejecting assertion that once a defendant placed social security money in a certificate of deposit, the funds were no longer exempt
  • Federally-exempt social security benefits deposited in a CD or savings account retain their exempt status
  • held that Social Security benefits were exempt from attachment or garnishment and that Social Security benefits did not lose their exempt status when they were invested in certificates of deposit
  • same for Social Security benefits placed into bank certificate of deposit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.