Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/31/1996
E.W. Ex Rel. J.R.W. v. Hall
Citations
- 917 P.2d 854
- 260 Kan. 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing whether social security benefits placed in a certificate of deposit retained their status as exempt from attachment/garnishment under Porter
- rejecting assertion that once a defendant placed social security money in a certificate of deposit, the funds were no longer exempt
- Federally-exempt social security benefits deposited in a CD or savings account retain their exempt status
- held that Social Security benefits were exempt from attachment or garnishment and that Social Security benefits did not lose their exempt status when they were invested in certificates of deposit
- same for Social Security benefits placed into bank certificate of deposit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland, Abbott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.