Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/31/1996
E.W. Ex Rel. J.R.W. v. Hall
Citations
- 917 P.2d 854
- 260 Kan. 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing whether social security benefits placed in a certificate of deposit retained their status as exempt from attachment/garnishment under Porter
- rejecting assertion that once a defendant placed social security money in a certificate of deposit, the funds were no longer exempt
- Federally-exempt social security benefits deposited in a CD or savings account retain their exempt status
- held that Social Security benefits were exempt from attachment or garnishment and that Social Security benefits did not lose their exempt status when they were invested in certificates of deposit
- same for Social Security benefits placed into bank certificate of deposit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland, Abbott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re MooreD. Kansas· 1997-10-10· cited 43×
- Anthis v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court· 2012-02-16· cited 37×
- In Re AdcockD. Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 11×
- Commerce Bank, N.A. v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-04-06· cited 8×
- Decker & Mattison Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-04-19· cited 7×
- Ecolono v. Division of Reimbursements of the Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-02· cited 5×
- Dillon Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-04-18· cited 4×
- In Re SmithE.D. Tennessee· 1999-11-24· cited 2×
- In Re AdcockD. Kansas· 1999-06-08· cited 2×
- In Re TessendorfD. Kansas· 2011-06-21· cited 1×
- Econolo v. Div. of ReimbursementCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-02
- Stormont-Vail Healthcare v. SieversCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-04-10
- State of Iowa v. Yoosuf MomentCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2021-03-17
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 411×
- Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas· 1991-12-17· cited 203×
- Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court· 1962-06-11· cited 151×
- Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1988-03-29· cited 128×
- Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of Florida, Plaintiff v. Rachel G. Davis, as Guardian of the Estate of Arthur Grady GlasscockFifth Circuit· 1980-05-08· cited 39×
- Younger v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-07-14· cited 31×
- Mariche v. MaricheSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-07-08· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.